In this article, we will compare Brooks vs ASICS running shoes and point out the main differences between ASICS and Brooks running shoes to help you choose the brand of running shoes for your needs.
We will cover:
- Which Is Better, Brooks Or ASICS Running Shoes?
- Brooks Vs ASICS: Main Differences
Let’s dive in!
Which Is Better, Brooks Or ASICS Running Shoes?
Before we dive into the specific differences in our Brooks vs ASICS running shoes head-to-head matchup, it’s important to establish that these are both fantastic running shoe companies that design and manufacture great running shoes well suited for many runners.
Both Brooks and ASICs are running shoe brands accepted by the American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA), which speaks to their merit, quality, and design.
Therefore, this Brooks vs ASICS running shoe comparison is less about which is the better running shoe and more about how the two reputable brands and their running shoes differ.
Every runner is unique in terms of their biomechanics, gait, training, injury risk, and running shoe preferences, which is why knowing the differences between ASICs vs Brooks running shoes can help you choose the best option for you.
We aren’t trying to crown any ultimate winner of the better shoe brand overall; rather, looking at ASICS vs Brooks differences in this context is guided by our goal of helping you narrow down your search for the right pair of running shoes for your specific body and running needs.
Therefore, the differences between Brooks and ASICS running shoes that we point out may not apply to every single shoe either company makes, but rather the general trends.
Brooks vs. ASICS: Main Differences
There aren’t a ton of notable differences between ASICS and Brooks running shoes.
In general, compared to ASICS, most Brooks running shoes feature a wider toe box.
It’s also important to mention that Brooks only designs running shoes, so they are super running-focused on their technology, R & D, etc., whereas ASICS manufactures shoes for lots of different sports. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but it’s a difference to point out.
Brooks also promotes their running shoes as being science-driven (usually real runners in wear-testing studies) to accommodate gait rather than correct it.
Compared to Brooks, ASICS running shoes tend to have a narrower fit and feel, particularly in the heel and toe box.
One of the most notable characteristics of ASICS running shoes is that they are known to feature GEL technology for improved cushioning and shock absorption.
#1: Brooks vs ASICS Running Shoes Durability
The durability of any running shoes depends on the confluence of factors specific to your body and your training, such as your body weight and size, how often you run and whether you rotate your shoes because doing so gives the material more time to rebound between uses, the terrain you run on, your gait and foot strike pattern, and the climate and weather you run in.
Then, there are obviously qualities of the running shoe itself that influence its durability, namely the materials used and the quality of construction.
Brooks, like many running shoe companies, recommends replacing their running shoes after 300 to 500 miles (500-800 km) of use (where you fall in that range will depend largely on the training and body factors mentioned).
ASICS reports a longer avenge lifespan, at 450-500 miles. Therefore, although we can’t conclusively say that ASICS running shoes are more durable than Brooks, clearly, they are designed to hold up well for the average runner.
#2: Brooks vs ASICS Running Shoes Fit
Probably the most significant difference between Brooks and ASICS running shoes is the general fit of the shoe.
Brooks running shoes normally have a wider toe box to accommodate natural foot splay when you run. This makes them an especially good option for runners with wide feet, bunions, metatarsalgia, or a more squared forefoot rather than a tapered one.
ASICS running shoes tend to run narrow, so you’ll find a much snugger fit if you do an apples-to-apples comparison of the same size and similar style running shoe between the two brands.
The heel cup is particularly narrow because there are actually structural design components (an external heel “clutch”) that are supposed to help increase support, while the GEL cushioning gives a plasma-like consistency so that your foot can still move in its natural way.
Both Brooks and ASICS have shoe fit finders on their websites to help runners determine how to get a running shoe that fits well and feels comfortable. Here is the Brooks fit finder, and here is the ASICS one.
#3: Brooks vs ASICS Running Shoes Cushioning
There are also some differences in the materials used for cushioning with Brooks versus ASICS running shoes.
Brooks shoes use one of several different foam materials for the midsole based on the primary purpose of the running shoes (e.g., racing flat versus cushioned trainer).
DNA LOFT is their softest cushioning and is made from a blend of EVA foam, rubber, and air, so it’s found in their cushioned and maximalist running shoes.
DNA AMP optimizes energy return because it is super springy and much stiffer than DNA LOFT. Therefore, it’s ideal for lightweight trainers and speed shoes where you want to optimize forward propulsion.
BioMoGo DNA lands in the middle of DNA LOFT and DNA AMP and is said to adapt to and accommodate your gait to provide the right support and cushion. It’s the Goldilocks if you will.
Finally, DNA Flash provides very little cushioning, so it’s for racing shoes.
Most ASICS shoes are cushioned with their famous GEL technology.
It can be a bit heavier than the foams used in Brooks running shoes, but it provides excellent shock absorption and tends to hold up better than foam, which is probably why ASICS shoes may last a bit longer than comparable Brooks shoes.
ASICS also uses Flytefoam technology to improve energy return and responsiveness, like Brooks DNA Amp. It doesn’t seem quite as springy, though.
#4: Brooks vs ASICS Running Shoes Stability
Most models in the Brooks lineup have both a neutral and support/stability version. These are distinguished by the “GTS” in the product name, which stands for “Go-To-Support.”
ASICS shoes offer stability both through the external heel clutch, which helps control pronation at landing, as well as a Duomax midsole, which is a dual-density material that provides support.
With either brand, you can find specific stability and motion-control shoes if you need extra support and pronation control.
Rather than being designed to correct your gait, Brooks running shoes are said to accommodate gait.
#5: Brooks vs ASICS Running Shoes Feel
Given the difference in fit and cushioning technology, ASICS and Brooks running shoes have a fairly different feel.
Brooks shoes are responsive and light, with a little more permissible foot movement, due to the wider build. ASICS shoes tend to feel a little cushier rather than springier due to the GEL. The snugger fit can help you feel like you have more control and support in the shoe.
They also tend to feel slightly heavier.
#6: Brooks vs ASICS Running Shoes Price
Both Brooks and ASICS running shoes are competitively and reasonably priced for the quality of the products.
The average price of each is about $110-150, with some models falling above and below and sale styles falling well under that.
When it comes to Brooks vs ASICS running shoes, it’s important to remember that rather than there being a definitive better option for all runners, the differences may make one brand better than the other for you.
Here are a few Brooks running shoes to check out:
Here are a few ASICS running shoes to check out: