Runners who are interested in trying a new brand of running shoes or who are looking to buy their first pair of running shoes often are well served by comparing the differences between characteristics of running shoes from popular brands.
Although most of the top running shoe companies produce a full lineup of running shoes with models for different types of training (trail vs road), different levels of support or arch structures, and different levels of cushioning, there are nuanced differences between the running shoes from different brands.
In this article, we will examine the features and differences between Nike vs Brooks running shoes to help you find which brand will be a better fit for you.
We will cover:
- Which Is Better, Nike or Brooks Running Shoes?
- Nike vs Brooks Running Shoes: Main Differences
Let’s get started!
Which Is Better, Nike or Brooks Running Shoes?
Before we look more closely at the differences between Nike vs Brooks running shoes, it’s important to establish that both companies are beloved by runners for their high-quality running shoes.
There isn’t necessarily a “better” brand between Nike vs Brooks running shoes; rather, you can get a premium or economical pair of running shoes from either brand, or any arch structure, pronation control needs, level of cushioning, and training style.
Beginners and recreational runners, to marathon runners and elite runners alike, enjoy both Nike and Brooks running shoes.
Your own foot shape, cushioning needs, degree of overpronation in your running gait, and other preferences may make either Brooks or Nike running shoes a better option for you, but the opposite may be true of another runner.
Nike running shoes are among the most popular choices for runners of all ability levels, from beginners to competitive and elite athletes, and Brooks focuses on science-driven running shoes, using feedback from real runners to modify and adjust running shoes.
Nike vs Brooks Running Shoes: Main Differences
There aren’t a lot of notable differences between Nike and Brooks running shoes.
In general, compared to Nike, most Brooks running shoes feature a wider toe box and wider shoe overall.
It’s also important to mention that Brooks only designs running shoes, so they are super running-focused on their technology, R & D, etc., whereas Nike manufactures shoes for lots of different sports. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but it is a small difference between the companies to point out.
Brooks also promotes their running shoes as being science-driven (usually real runners in wear-testing studies) to accommodate gait rather than correct it.
Compared to Brooks, Nike running shoes tend to have a narrower fit and feel, particularly in the heel and toe box. Nike also strives to use post-consumer recycled materials in their products to improve sustainability.
Let’s go into some more detail regarding these slight differences:
Nike Vs Brooks Running Shoes: Durability
There are numerous factors that affect the durability of your running shoes or how many miles you can run in them before you will need to replace them.
For example, in terms of the shoes themselves, the primary factors that impact the projected lifespan of the running shoes are the materials that are used and the quality of the construction.
Your body weight, foot structure in terms of arch height, how much you overpronate, running gait characteristics, how many miles you run, whether or not you rotate your running shoes, what type of terrain you run on, and whether your shoes stay dry and are well cared for, are examples of some of the factors that can affect how long your running shoes will last.
Brooks and Nike, like many running shoe companies, recommend replacing their running shoes after 300 to 500 miles (500-800 km) of use.
The exception is the Nike VaporFly, which is said to last only 200-300 miles since it is a racing shoe.
Keep in mind that where you personally fall in this range will depend largely on the training and body factors mentioned, as well as the particular model of running shoes you choose.
Nike Vs Brooks Running: Shoes Fit
Runners usually find that the most significant difference between Brooks and Nike running shoes is the general fit of the shoe.
Brooks running shoes are known to have a wider toe box to accommodate natural foot splay when you run.
This makes Brooks shoes an especially good choice for runners with wide feet, bunions, metatarsalgia, or a more squared forefoot rather than a tapered one.
There are also a decent number of the models in the Brooks lineup that are offered in wide width in addition to the standard width for men and women.
Nike running shoes are notorious for running narrow and small, particularly through the midfoot and heel, but the toe box is also quite narrow, especially in a head-to-head Nike vs Brooks running shoe comparison.
Therefore, you’ll find a much snugger fit if you do an apples-to-apples comparison of the same size and similar style running shoe between these two brands.
Both Brooks and Nike have shoe fit finders on their websites to help runners determine how to get a running shoe that fits well and feels comfortable. Here is the Brooks fit finder, and here is the Nike one.
Brooks vs. Nike Running Shoes: Cushioning
The primary difference in the cushioning between Nike vs Brooks running shoes is in the cushioning materials and technology and the resultant feel.
The type of cushioning material found in the midsole of Brooks shoes depends on the primary type of running shoe (e.g., racing flat versus cushioned trainer).
The softest type of cushioning for the maximalist and highly cushioned shoes is the DNA LOFT material. It is made from a blend of EVA foam, rubber, and air, so it is very plush and has a lot of give to absorb impact forces.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, lightweight trainers, where the goal is to optimize forward propulsion and speed, use a cushioning material known as DNA AMP.
It is much different than DNA LOFT because it is designed to be super springy rather than particularly soft in order to help optimize energy return. It is responsive and light but does not have a lot of give.
BioMoGo DNA falls in the middle of DNA LOFT and DNA AMP and is said to adapt to and accommodate your gait to provide the right amount of rebound and cushioning.
Finally, DNA Flash is used in racing shoes and minimalist shoes because it provides very little cushioning.
Nike uses various very lightweight foams and also injects air-filled cells into their shoes for cushioning and bounce to give you a spring in your step while reducing shock.
Brooks vs Nike Running Shoes: Stability
Brooks stability shoes are unique relative to many other stability and motion-control running shoes from competitors. Rather than aiming to correct your gait, Brooks stability shoes are designed to “accommodate your gait.”
Most models in the Brooks lineup are offered in both a neutral and support/stability version. The support or stability models are distinguished by the “GTS” in the product name, which stands for “Go-To-Support.”
Nike stability shoes are stiffer overall and have a wider base for more support, a heel flare for pronation control, and a gentle S shape to the shoe to pride lateral stability through the heel-to-toe transition.
Nike vs Brooks Running Shoes: Price
Both Brooks and Nike running shoes are competitively and reasonably priced for the quality of the products.
The average price for either is about $110-160, although there are more Nike shoes that have a higher price point than Brooks.
Overall, when comparing Brooks vs Nike running shoes, it’s important to remember that rather than there being a definitive better option for all runners, the differences may make one brand better than the other for you.
If you are looking for a wider fit, particularly in the toe box, you should consider Brooks vs Nike running shoes, and if you prefer a snugger fit and cutting-edge technology, you will likely prefer Nike vs Brooks running shoes.
Here are a few Brooks running shoes to check out:
Here are a few Nike running shoes to check out: