The Pacing Mistake Behind Most Marathon Meltdowns

A study of nearly 79,000 Boston Marathon finishers found even pacers hit the wall just 0.2% of the time — while those who went out too fast paid for it late.

Avatar photo
Brady Holmer
Avatar photo
Brady Holmer, Sports Science Editor: a 2:24 marathoner, has a Bachelor’s degree in Exercise Science from Northern Kentucky University and a Ph.D. in Applied Physiology and Kinesiology from the University of Florida.

Sports Science Editor

The first miles of a marathon often feel suspiciously easy. That is precisely what makes them dangerous: the pace that feels relaxed at mile three can become very… “unrelaxed” at mile 23.

A large observational study analyzed 78,912 finishers from the 2015 through 2017 Boston Marathons. The runners were 18 to 84 years old, and 45.5% were women. Using split times from nine checkpoints, the researchers grouped pacing profiles into four patterns: even pacing, mild positive splitting, strong positive splitting, and variable pacing.

Runners blurred.

Nearly half of the runners, 47.9%, landed in the even-pacing cluster. Another 31.9% showed a mild positive split, 12.2% a strong positive split, and 8.0% a highly variable pattern. “Even” did not mean metronomic: runners in that cluster generally stayed within about 5% of their average pace and still had a modestly faster first half.

  • Even pacing was associated with the fastest average finish time, 216.9 minutes, compared with roughly 276 minutes in the strong-positive-split group.
  • Variable pacers finished about 39.7 minutes slower than even pacers on average.
  • The pattern also appeared within performance bands: even pacing was associated with a 4.6-minute advantage over strong positive splitting among sub-three-hour runners and a roughly 13-minute advantage among recreational and slower runners.

The most dramatic result involved “hitting the wall,” defined here as running the final segment more than 20% slower than the average pace through 22 miles (35 kilometers). Overall, 15.2% of runners met that threshold. It occurred in only 0.2% of the even-pacing group but 85.4% of the variable-pacing group. Runners whose opening 10K was more than 5% faster than their eventual average pace hit the wall 26.6% of the time, compared with 1.5% among those who opened near their average.

What this means for runners

Base your opening pace on training, tune-up races, course demands, and conditions—not on how comfortable the first 10K feels. On a hilly course, aim for even effort rather than mechanically identical splits.

My advice is to practice that restraint during long runs. A pacing plan becomes much easier to follow when you have repeatedly felt the difference between sustainable marathon effort and the slightly-too-fast pace that only reveals its cost late in the race.

The Pacing Mistake Behind Most Marathon Meltdowns 1
Pacing patterns according to performance level.

RunClub — Free

Join 300,000+ runners in RunClub

Free training plans for every distance, a daily running game, exclusive coaching content, and a real community of runners. Create your free account in 20 seconds — no card.

Create my free account →

Start the conversation

Be the first to share your take.
Commenting as a guest. Members get a profile, image uploads and the RunClub newsroom. Join free →
Your email is never published.

No comments yet — be the first to weigh in.

Avatar photo

Brady Holmer

Sports Science Editor

Brady Holmer, Sports Science Editor: a 2:24 marathoner, has a Bachelor’s degree in Exercise Science from Northern Kentucky University and a Ph.D. in Applied Physiology and Kinesiology from the University of Florida.

Want To Save This Guide For Later?

Enter your email and we'll give it over to your inbox.